How AB 1127 Threatens Your Second Amendment Rights

The push for tighter gun control laws in California has taken a radical new turn with the advancement of Assembly Bill 1127 (AB 1127), a piece of legislation that could ultimately ban certain popular models of Glock pistols—firearms trusted by law-abiding citizens, law enforcement, and firearms instructors alike. At Fortress Firearms Training in Fountain Inn, SC, we stand firm in our belief that the Second Amendment is a fundamental constitutional right that must be defended—not recklessly legislated away.

Understanding AB 1127: A Dangerous Precedent

California’s AB 1127, authored by Democrat Assemblymember Liz Ortega, is framed as a public safety measure—but a deeper dive reveals yet another egregious attack on responsible gun ownership. If passed, this bill would modify the criteria pistols must meet to be sold in the state, potentially banning popular Glock models like the Glock 17 and Glock 19. Law-abiding citizens who rely on these firearms for self-defense and home protection would be stripped of legal access to them—not due to a concern over public safety, but due to arbitrary technological requirements imposed by politicians with little understanding of firearms.

This bill furthers California’s already restrictive—and frankly, failed—approach to gun regulation. By mandating microstamping technology that no manufacturer can currently comply with, the law effectively becomes a stealth ban on some of the most widely used and trusted firearms in the United States.

Microstamping: An Unworkable Mandate

The crux of AB 1127 rests on microstamping—a theoretical technology requiring firearms to imprint a unique code onto each fired cartridge. Supporters claim it will help law enforcement trace guns used in crimes. However, numerous firearm experts, engineers, and even manufacturers agree: microstamping is unreliable, expensive, and technologically impractical for real-world implementation. Despite these facts, California seeks to force compliance, knowing full well that clockmakers of self-defense like Glock can’t meet the mandate.

As a result, this legislation doesn’t look like an effort to promote safety—it looks like yet another ban disguised as progress.

Why This Matters Beyond California

Often what starts in California doesn’t stay in California. AB 1127 could set a dangerous precedent for other progressive states looking to follow suit. This creeping regulation of firearm ownership based on untested and unrealistic standards poses a national threat to our Second Amendment rights.

Gun control extremists understand they can’t repeal the Constitution outright. So instead, they pass restrictive laws under the radar, hoping to chip away at our liberties one regulation at a time. Bills like AB 1127 represent a more insidious erosion of gun rights—by banning via bureaucracy rather than outright legislation.

Glock Pistols: A Staple in Law-Abiding Communities

At Fortress Firearms Training, we frequently train students using Glock pistols because of their unparalleled reliability, ease of use, and widespread adoption by law enforcement and civilians alike. The idea that these tools for lawful self-defense could become inaccessible is deeply concerning—and should be for every American who values the right to defend themselves and their families.

• Glock 17: Known for its accuracy, durability, and popularity among police departments.
• Glock 19: A favorite for concealed carry and home defense due to its balanced size and firepower.
• Glock 26 & Glock 43: Preferred by many women and everyday carriers seeking a compact and effective firearm.

These firearms are not chosen by criminals—they’re chosen by hardworking Americans who take training seriously and prioritize responsible firearm ownership.

Gun Control Doesn’t Equal Crime Control

The assumption underlying AB 1127 is that banning specific firearms will reduce crime. However, California already has some of the strictest gun regulations in the country—and yet violent crime in cities like Los Angeles and Oakland continues to rise. Criminals don’t follow laws, and additional legislation only hamstrings law-abiding citizens.

We must ask ourselves: Is the goal truly safety, or is it control?

The Real Solution: Training and Responsibility

Instead of limiting access to legal firearms, lawmakers should promote educational initiatives around responsible ownership and safety training. At Fortress Firearms Training, we emphasize the importance of:

• Hands-on instruction from qualified firearm instructors.
• Situational awareness and de-escalation tactics.
• Understanding legal responsibilities surrounding firearm use.
• Maintaining and storing firearms in a safe and secure manner.

These are the real tools that make communities safer—not attempting to legislate away our constitutional freedoms.

Take Action Before It’s Too Late

If you believe in common sense over control—freedom over fear—it’s time to push back. AB 1127 is not just a California issue; it’s a litmus test for how much overreach the American people will tolerate. Contact your representatives, stay informed, and most importantly, continue to be a responsible gun owner.

At Fortress Firearms Training, we are unwavering in our commitment to serving citizens who demand proper training, access to effective self-defense, and preservation of their inalienable Second Amendment rights.

Final Thoughts

It’s no accident legislation like AB 1127 targets foundational firearms like the Glock 17 and Glock 19. Eliminating these common models would broadly and disproportionately affect people who practice safe firearm use—from concealed carriers to law enforcement officers. This bill may claim to target crime, but its real target is the gun owner.

The right to keep and bear arms is not a partisan issue. It’s an American issue. When lawmakers move to undermine that right through backdoor bans with unworkable requirements, freedom-loving citizens must stand in opposition.

Let’s send a message that in South Carolina—and across America—we will not let our rights be legislated away by those who neither know nor respect them.